Prediction of Daniel Milavsky [687th] vs Tim Ruehl [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W L
Form
L W L W W L W W L LH2H: Milavsky 1 - 0 Ruehl
They have played 3 sets in total, with Milavsky winning 2 and Ruehl winning 1. The last match between Milavsky and Ruehl was at the M15 Tallahassee, 20-11-2024, First, I.hard with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-3 6-7(5) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Milavsky | 1 |
| Tim Ruehl | 0 |
| Milavsky | Stats | Ruehl |
|---|---|---|
| 83% (10-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 687 | Ranking | N/A |
| 687 | Highest Rank | |
| 23 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 71% (30-12) | Career Total W/L | 54% (58-49) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Tim Ruehl
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 11 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:36:0 | Average Match Time | 2:36:0 |
| 68% (58/85) | 1st Serve % | 53% (45/85) |
| 78% (45/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (29/45) |
| 48% (13/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (17/40) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 46% (39/85) | Return Points Win % | 32% (27/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Milavsky vs Tim Ruehl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Milavsky 1 - 0 Ruehl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milavsky has won 46.58% of points on their second serve, while Ruehl has won 42.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milavsky, in recent form, has won 50.6% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ruehl has won 51.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.18% and 22.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milavsky has saved 56.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruehl has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milavsky has won 81.48% of matches played (W/L 22/ 5), with Ruehl winning 47.62% (W/L 10/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milavsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 80% (W/L 12/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Ruehl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 33/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Milavsky has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 81.48% of matches (W/L 22/ 5), where as Ruehl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 9/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milavsky winning 1 times and Ruehl being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Milavsky winning 2 and Ruehl winning 1. The last match between Milavsky and Ruehl was at the M15 Tallahassee, 20-11-2024, First, I.hard with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-3 6-7(5) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Milavsky and Ruehl have played a deciding set 1 times, with Milavsky winning 1 times and Ruehl 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Milavsky winning 0, and Ruehl 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milavsky has played against opponents with an average rank of 74.3 while Ruehl has played against players with an average rank of 171.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milavsky has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruehl has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milavsky has converted 27.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruehl has converted 100% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Daniel Milavsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Daniel Milavsky
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Attila Boros
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Daniel Milavsky
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Alfredo Perez
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Brian Bozemoj
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Adam Farag Cao
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Edward Winter
65%
(
77 of
118)
1st Serve %
61%
(
80 of
131)
17
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
131)
133
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Guillaume Dalmasso
63%
(
76 of
121)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
7
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
8
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
45 of
55)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
32%
(
39 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
102)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Sebastian Gima
63%
(
80 of
128)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
52 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
130
Total Points Won
121
|
6-2 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Dan Martin
55%
(
52 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 2-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Ruehl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Tim Ruehl
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Tim Ruehl
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Matei Cristian Onofrei
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Stuart Parker
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elgin Khoeblal
Player
Tim Ruehl
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Dax Donders
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
121)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
121)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Marlon Vankan
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
105)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Tim Ruehl
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Ruehl
Player
Noah Lopez
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Tim Ruehl
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-0 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Milavsky vs Ruehl?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Milavsky Vs Ruehl is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71% (30/12) | Win/Loss | 54% (58/49) |
| 67% (66/33) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (132/117) |
| 57% (543/408) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1183/1100) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 144 | Aces Total | 81 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 129 | Total Double Faults | 132 |
| 1:19:43 | Average Match Time | 1:4:20 |
| 65.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 112.97 |
| 60% (1270/2132) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2380/3944) |
| 72% (918/1270) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1484/2380) |
| 49% (423/862) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (717/1564) |
| 45% (104/229) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (184/407) |
| 42% (872/2065) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1598/3815) |
| 70% (28/40) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (57/105) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (4/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (12/25) |
| 53% (8/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 90% (29/26) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (52/47) |
| 10% (29/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (52/5) |
| 31% (13/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (55/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
